Current Research Projects:
LATINNO – Innovations for Democracy in Latin America
LATINNO is the first comprehensive and systematic source of data on new institutions for citizen participation evolving in Latin America – the so-called democratic innovations.
The project assumes that citizen participation has become an important means to improve the quality of democracy in Latin America. Thousands of new institutional designs have been created in the previous years that aim not only to include more citizens in the political process, but also – through citizen participation – to make governments more responsive and institutions more accountable, in addition to strengthening the rule of law, and promoting social equality.
It has collected data on democratic innovations evolving in 18 Latin America countries from the years of 1990 to 2016. The data is coded for 43 variables related to the context, institutional design, and impact of each innovation. Along with the quantitative data, qualitative information on each case has also been gathered and assessed. This prolifically rich content is now being analyzed in policy briefs and academic papers.
LATINNO is not just a dataset. It is a research project that produces new, comparative knowledge on democratic innovations, democracy, and citizen participation in Latin America
LATINNO seeks to emphasize that democracy in Latin America encompasses more than elections and that new forms of participation go well beyond protests and demonstrations. It assumes that democratic innovations are new mediations between state and civil society, along with more traditional institutions like parliaments and political parties. LATINNO considers that the growing volume and scope of innovations are changing the political landscape in Latin America and transforming representative democracy from within.
It has been claimed that Latin America exists as a laboratory of political innovations and participatory governance. Governments, civil society organizations, and international agencies create new practices and institutions aimed at involving citizens in the democratic process. However, knowledge on participatory innovations has been mostly limited to case studies, which frequently focus on a limited number of initiatives at the local level (e.g. participatory budgeting). Before the LATINNO database, there was no systematic and comparative knowledge on democratic innovations across countries and institutional designs, since most information was widespread and difficult to gather.
LATINNO’s aim is to fill this gap. Our data allows cross comparisons over more than 2,400 different institutional designs in 18 countries, and our research assesses their effectiveness and evaluates whether or not they contribute to and enhance the quality of democracy in Latin America.
More than simply providing information on individual cases, LATINNO seeks to underscore the diversity of new institutional designs and experimentations with citizen participation in Latin America. In addition to identifying and mapping out new means of participation, LATINNO’s database makes data comparable across institutional designs and countries.
LATINNO adopts a broad definition of democratic innovation and comprises various forms of political experimentation, provided that they involve citizen participation, and may have a potential impact on the public policy cycle. Cases are coded for three sets of variables concerning their context, institutional design, and impact.
For LATINNO, each case stands for a particular experimentation with citizen participation with a specific institutional design, and not every single implementation of the same innovation. For instance, LATINNO does not count every single implementation of participatory budgeting (PB) as a case. In our database, there will be no more than three cases of PB per country: face-to-face PB, online PB, and multi-channel PB. However, based on the available information, we do try to register how many of each of these three institutional designs have existed or are active in each country, and in which cities they have been implemented. We apply this same coding logic for innovations with several implementations/occurrences within a single country: yet, whenever there is variation in the institutional design, we code it as a separate case.
LATINNO’s database covers as many cases as our team has been able to find in each country until reaching a stage of data exhaustion. After a long experimental phase and a pilot project, we have developed and tested a rigorous procedure to identify, code and assess information on democratic innovations. We have devised a methodology to search information, which includes sources as diverse as scholars, civil society organizations, governments, international organizations, existing databases, and the media. The primary and secondary data we rely on is comprised of academic work, research reports, impact assessments, constitutions, laws, administrative norms, policies, governmental programs, and different media outlets. Cases are coded according to our codebook, which has been drafted and adjusted several times based on the material and evidence we have found. Our coders receive continuous training and are regularly checked upon to ensure reliability. Complex cases, coding issues, and conceptual questions are discussed collectively in regular team meetings.
The LATINNO database is publicly available on this website through a friendly platform designed to reach beyond the academic community. In addition to displaying in an accessible way the data coded, each case is shortly described. Cases can be browsed through filters and search mechanisms designed to allow multiple comparisons of democratic innovations.
The LATINNO database is updated constantly as new cases arise and new information on existing cases become available
The LATINNO project is now in its second phase. The first phase (2015-2017) comprised a pilot project to develop and test the research design, as well as data collection for all 18 countries. In this stage, we developed and refined our methodological tools to identify and assess cases, in addition to sharing our first results in papers, publications, conferences, media, our monthly newsletter, and social media. The LATINNO database was officially launched together with this website on June 27th, 2017, during an International Conference at the WZB, Berlin.
The second and current phase of the project (2017-2019) seeks to deepen the knowledge provided by our data. It is structured around four axes: maintenance and update of the database, deepening of academic analyses, communication and publication of results, and internationalization with focus on Southern Europe.
Previous Research Projects:
In 2009-2010 I’ve built ISEGORIA, a database that contains all deliberations from the National Public Policy Conferences in Brazil (NPPC) and all legislative acts from the Brazilian federal Legislature that match them. ISEGORIA covers the period 1988-2010, comprising over a hundred of NPPCs. ISEGORIA was funded by the Ministry of Justice of Brazil (2009) and the General Secretary of the Presidency of Brazil (2010). The data is available online (except data for 2009 and 2010) here.
If you’d like to use and cite ISEGORIA data: Pogrebinschi, Thamy (2010). Banco de Dados ISEGORIA. Available from: http://portal.mj.gov.br/isegoria/consultarConferencia/exibirTelaInicial.do